Exchanging ideas to create the well-being advantage

Flexible working is not only important for those at the start and in the middle of their careers – it matters just as much for our most senior workers. There inevitably comes a time when senior leaders actively seek more flexibility because they want to start to enjoy the fruits of their labours - but this is not to say that they don’t still have a lot to offer the business. I can really empathise with this perspective and I’m fortunate enough to have employers who provide plenty of opportunities for academics to work flexibly: The benefit for them is that we stay productive and feel motivated to perform our jobs to the best of our abilities; and can do it in different contexts.

But this is not true for all senior leaders – as often they feel (sometimes rightly, sometimes wrongly) that the business cannot function without their full attention. This is exacerbated where there isn’t any sign of a well-developed succession plan that delivers the next generation of leaders to the organisation. In this situation, the pressure is piled on a small number of senior leaders with no end in sight - in some cases cutting potentially impressive careers short. 

However, where succession planning is well-developed, all sorts of innovative options are available. For example, outgoing CEOs can spend a number of months / years actively mentoring potential successors, and can generally get much more closely involved in inspiring and developing high potential employees.

This kind of behaviour hints at a concept known as ‘Eldership’. Eldership has its roots in African and Asian tribal culture where former leaders pass over into a council of Elders at a certain point in their lives. The role of the Elder is to be a challenging sounding board for the current leadership. So each tribe - itself an organisation - has an impartial group of people who they know only have the best interests of the group in mind. Their role is to draw on their individual, collective and cultural experience to ‘quality assure’ the decisions of the current leaders.

To me this sounds like something that could work well in many organisations I know - both public and private. Of course, some might say that this is the role of Non-Executive Directors, but this is not always the case because, unlike Elders, Non-Execs could be younger but have specific professional skills (i.e. financial accounting, legal) and they may have multiple roles in many different companies. No matter how well-meaning and impartial the individuals concerned, they’re really just acting as consultants.

The closest equivalent to Elders in the western world are experienced statesmen such as Nelson Mandela, Kofi Anan and Jimmy Carter. These are people who have been there and have done it, and who have now crossed a line from being full-time politicians to acting as trusted advisors to the world. In the case of these people, I think the vast majority of us believe that they have the world’s best interests at heart.

Commercial organisations are not tribes, but they do share plenty of characteristics with these most ancient of communities which evolved with the narrow goal of survival.  It may be too idealistic to expect senior executives to continue working for the good of the business ‘gratis’ into their dotage, but there are aspects of the concept of Eldership that most organisations could fairly easily adopt anfld integrate with their succession plan for the top level.  This is all part of the recipe  for designing a sustainable, successful organisation - and of course, providing extra flexibility in the latter stages of a career means the business is looking after those who spend a large part of their careers looking after the rest of the workforce – which, when you think about it, is only fair.